Contents
The Numbers
Moneyline (Regular Time) | |||
Home | Draw | Away | |
DraftKings | -125 | +285 | +290 |
55.6% | 26.0% | 25.6% | |
Insights |
55.7% | 22.3% | 22.0% |
Over/Under (Regular Time) | |||
O 2.5 | U 2.5 | BTTS | |
DraftKings | -150 | +120 | -165 |
60.0% | 45.5% | 62.3% | |
Insights |
58.0% | 42.0% | 57.1% |
What The Book Sees
The line suggests that SKC are roughly 4 xGD (.13/game) stonger than STL over a full season.
What Insights Sees
The BI model projects SKC as a mid-table team and STL as a lower mid-table side.
What we reasonably expect...
SKC want to dominate the ball; STL will be fine playing against the ball and creating chances in transition.
The high-leverage variable will likely be…
SKC center back mistakes.
After 6 months, we're now seeing SKC's first choice lineup and approach. The attack is balanced (Russel wide 1v1s from the right, Salloi outside in from the left); the midfield is aligned. As a result, we return to the original SKC question: Can the center backs play at "playoffs floor" level? Can they avoid big mistakes that could hamstring the team? Rosero should solve that as the no-nonsense option, but he's also had a couple big mistakes already this year. If Rosero and Fontas play mistake-free -- not even "well", just mistake-free -- then SKC will be good value as there ratings will still be lagged to the lineup getting healthy.